On the outset of 1987, Kevin Costner was finest often called the cocky gunslinger Jake in Lawrence Kasdan’s Western romp “Silverado.” This was a make-good function from the director, who’d lower Costner out of “The Huge Chill” as a result of his portrayal of the deceased Alex did not play properly with check audiences; principally, the ensemble solid had carried out such an awesome job of increase Alex’s significance that the then unknown Costner could not dwell as much as the legend. And whereas it was a pleasant gesture on Kasdan’s half, “Silverado” did not fairly catch fireplace on the field workplace in the summertime of 1985.
So when Costner landed the plum role of Eliot Ness in Brian De Palma’s 1987 gangster saga “The Untouchables,” Paramount Footage mounted a publicity offensive to promote the interesting 32-year-old actor as a serious film star who’d in the end arrived. Decked out in high quality Giorgio Armani threads and armed with razor-sharp David Mamet dialogue, Costner was principally taking batting apply with a corked bat. How might he not ascend to full-blown film stardom as Ness with De Palma behind the digital camera, and Sean Connery and Robert De Niro as his foils?
Most individuals will let you know Costner delivered as anticipated, however he’ll counter that he might’ve carried out higher. How so? By bringing to his function the one factor his co-stars had in spades and he lacked: expertise.
Kevin Costner felt outgunned on the set of The Untouchables
In a 2024 interview with GQ tied to the discharge of his as-yet-uncompleted Western epic “Horizon: An American Saga,” Costner opened up in regards to the making of “The Untouchables.” Whereas the movie is an unimpeachable basic that grossed $76 million within the U.S. (ok to complete sixth on the field workplace in 1987), Costner thinks he introduced a knife to a gunfight.
“‘The Untouchables’ was a very well-written script,” stated Costner. “David Mamet had written actually a really excellent script, and so I wished to be part of it. Brian de Palma directed it, and naturally, Sean Connery was in it, you understand, Robert De Niro, and it was a great second for me to be in that film.” It was a great second, nevertheless it wasn’t the precise time for Costner. “I really did not suppose Sean was the sort of man that was gonna like me,” he stated. “I do not know why, however he did. He was good to me. And I realized lots as a result of my eyes had been open. I want I used to be a greater actor once I did ‘The Untouchables’ however I used to be the place I used to be at.”
Some critics had been unkind to Costner again in 1987. Roger Ebert wrote, “The script would not give him, and [Costner] would not present, any of the little twists and turns of character which may have made Ness into a person.” I disagree with this. No matter we all know of Ness’ post-prohibition life (e.g. that he turned a barely employable drunk) has no buy in De Palma’s film. Historical past, typically, has no buy. Do you suppose Ness led a Canadian-border liquor raid with the Mounties? Pure fantasy. De Palma and Mamet’s Ness is a boy scout as a result of that is what this system gangster movie requires. Costner does as solid and directed. Had he been extra assured, he may’ve second-guessed De Palma as he is carried out with different administrators, and that may’ve gone poorly. De Palma got him at the right time, and Costner was the correct of naïf. Right here, as Sean Connery’s Malone would say, endeth the lesson.
On the outset of 1987, Kevin Costner was finest often called the cocky gunslinger Jake in Lawrence Kasdan’s Western romp “Silverado.” This was a make-good function from the director, who’d lower Costner out of “The Huge Chill” as a result of his portrayal of the deceased Alex did not play properly with check audiences; principally, the ensemble solid had carried out such an awesome job of increase Alex’s significance that the then unknown Costner could not dwell as much as the legend. And whereas it was a pleasant gesture on Kasdan’s half, “Silverado” did not fairly catch fireplace on the field workplace in the summertime of 1985.
So when Costner landed the plum role of Eliot Ness in Brian De Palma’s 1987 gangster saga “The Untouchables,” Paramount Footage mounted a publicity offensive to promote the interesting 32-year-old actor as a serious film star who’d in the end arrived. Decked out in high quality Giorgio Armani threads and armed with razor-sharp David Mamet dialogue, Costner was principally taking batting apply with a corked bat. How might he not ascend to full-blown film stardom as Ness with De Palma behind the digital camera, and Sean Connery and Robert De Niro as his foils?
Most individuals will let you know Costner delivered as anticipated, however he’ll counter that he might’ve carried out higher. How so? By bringing to his function the one factor his co-stars had in spades and he lacked: expertise.
Kevin Costner felt outgunned on the set of The Untouchables
In a 2024 interview with GQ tied to the discharge of his as-yet-uncompleted Western epic “Horizon: An American Saga,” Costner opened up in regards to the making of “The Untouchables.” Whereas the movie is an unimpeachable basic that grossed $76 million within the U.S. (ok to complete sixth on the field workplace in 1987), Costner thinks he introduced a knife to a gunfight.
“‘The Untouchables’ was a very well-written script,” stated Costner. “David Mamet had written actually a really excellent script, and so I wished to be part of it. Brian de Palma directed it, and naturally, Sean Connery was in it, you understand, Robert De Niro, and it was a great second for me to be in that film.” It was a great second, nevertheless it wasn’t the precise time for Costner. “I really did not suppose Sean was the sort of man that was gonna like me,” he stated. “I do not know why, however he did. He was good to me. And I realized lots as a result of my eyes had been open. I want I used to be a greater actor once I did ‘The Untouchables’ however I used to be the place I used to be at.”
Some critics had been unkind to Costner again in 1987. Roger Ebert wrote, “The script would not give him, and [Costner] would not present, any of the little twists and turns of character which may have made Ness into a person.” I disagree with this. No matter we all know of Ness’ post-prohibition life (e.g. that he turned a barely employable drunk) has no buy in De Palma’s film. Historical past, typically, has no buy. Do you suppose Ness led a Canadian-border liquor raid with the Mounties? Pure fantasy. De Palma and Mamet’s Ness is a boy scout as a result of that is what this system gangster movie requires. Costner does as solid and directed. Had he been extra assured, he may’ve second-guessed De Palma as he is carried out with different administrators, and that may’ve gone poorly. De Palma got him at the right time, and Costner was the correct of naïf. Right here, as Sean Connery’s Malone would say, endeth the lesson.
