Unlock the Editor’s Digest free of charge
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly e-newsletter.
After-hours trading is an odd, largely American phenomenon. How a inventory strikes instantly after post-close earnings will are likely to set the tone for the subsequent common buying and selling day (Jiang et al, 2012), despite the fact that it’s on skinny liquidity the place the one energetic gamers are high-frequency companies and retail punters (Cui, 2021; Scharnowski, 2024).
One of many firms posting earnings this week was Tesla. In extended-hours buying and selling, its shares very briefly went down, then went up:
To recap, the politically advantaged automaker missed fourth-quarter expectations by a mile.
EBIT was $1.58bn (consensus: $2.7bn). Internet margin was 6.2 per cent (consensus: 9.9 per cent). Auto income of $18.7bn missed by 11 per cent following a quarter-on-quarter drop within the common promoting value.
EPS was in line solely after Tesla booked $837mn of “Different revenue”, almost all of which was from marking to market its bitcoin pockets. With out the crypto write-up, EPS would have been $0.49 (consensus: $0.77). Logically, nothing right here helps the stronger post-close share value. And but . . .
The standard clarification for when Tesla buying and selling resembles a Pump.enjoyable shitcoin is: “as a result of Elon talks rather a lot”. Right here’s JPMorgan analyst Ryan Brinkman to develop on the theme:
It’s not clear to us why Tesla shares traded as a lot as +5% larger within the
aftermarket Wednesday, though we’ve some main theories. Maybe it was administration’s assertion that it had recognized an achievable path to turning into value greater than the world’s 5 most useful firms taken collectively (i.e., greater than the $14.8 trillion mixed market capitalizations of Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA, Amazon, & Alphabet). Or perhaps it was administration’s perception that simply considered one of its merchandise has by itself the potential to generate “north of $10 trillion in income”. It could have even associated to administration steerage for 2026 (no monetary targets had been supplied, nevertheless it was stated to be “epic”) and for 2027 and 2028 (“ridiculously good”).
Brinkman, who has a long-standing “underweight” score on Tesla, is starting to sound a bit exasperated:
[T]he firm’s monetary efficiency and Bloomberg consensus for income, margin, earnings, and money movement all preserve coming down, however analyst value targets and the corporate’s share value preserve going up. For example, Tesla has missed Bloomberg consensus EBIT in 9 of the previous 10 quarters by a median of -16.3%.
Persistently lacking estimates is one factor. What Tesla has been doing is persistently lacking lowered estimates, per this chart from Dan’s post earlier within the week:
On JPMorgan’s numbers, Tesla’s reported This fall EBIT was 82 per cent under the extent anticipated 10 quarters in the past. The inventory is up 75 per cent over the identical interval, and the sellside has been YOLOing by way of all of it:
From October 19, 2022 by way of January 29, 2025, analysts tracked by Bloomberg have lowered their common EBIT estimates by -70% for 2025 (from $36.8 bn then to $11.2 bn at this time) and by -67% for 2026 (from $46.5 bn then to $15.4 bn at this time) however have over the identical time raised their 12-month value goal for TSLA shares by +18% (from a median $289 then to $342 at this time).
A number of different commentators have noticed this obvious disconnect between Tesla’s fundamentals and the elemental evaluation.
“The sellside analysts taking over their value targets on these numbers are whores,” Gordon Johnson, the Tesla permabear founding father of GLJ Analysis, informed us by electronic mail on Thursday, including helpfully: “be at liberty to cite GLJ on that phrase for phrase.”
Brinkman’s perspective is extra measured:
For a way for much longer can [Tesla] inventory stay divorced from the basics? It has continued for much longer than we might ever have suspected, however we don’t suppose it might proceed perpetually; given the appreciable run up within the shares as efficiency and anticipated future efficiency have by equal measure deteriorated, we sense a excessive danger of imply reversion (together with by potential catalysts that could be troublesome to foresee at current).
All of which brings us again to the extended-hours buying and selling.
As famous above, the speedy share-price response to earnings units the tone. Tesla’s 5 per cent after-hours bounce impelled commentators to back-engineer an evidence. That meant diving into This fall outlook, skipping near-term steerage for ASP and COGS that was to decrease expectations additional, and pulling out the (largely reiterated) stuff about full-self driving, cybercabs and helper robots by 2026.
Awaiting Musk’s headliner efficiency on the convention name, the constructive market response to guarantees of jam subsequent 12 months was a useful assist act.
It appears to work this fashion each quarter, just about:
Tesla’s greatest asset is hyperbole. The extra excessive the hyperbole, the extra precious it will get. Perhaps after-hours market individuals perceive the dynamics higher than Tesla bears, so are primed to park fundamentals and commerce on vibes. Or perhaps one thing else totally is happening.
Additional studying:
— Tesla’s departure from reality, in one chart (FTAV)
— A fork in the road for Tesla (FTAV)
